The Quote Wall

What they said. Where they stand.

Each card pairs an MP's past climate statement with their current position on pipeline expansion — or their silence. Missing details will be filled in as MPs respond.

Mark Carney
Mark Carney
Nepean
Prime Minister of Canada
What they said before
Built a global brand as the climate-finance banker — UN Special Envoy on Climate Action, chair of GFANZ, author of Value(s) — arguing that markets must be reshaped around net-zero.UN / GFANZ / Value(s) (2021)
What is happening now

As Prime Minister, killed the consumer carbon price, greenlit a 'nation-building' fast-track for major projects, and openly courted new oil and gas pipeline expansion — the exact fossil-fuel buildout he warned against as a banker.

Why constituents should care

Climate voters were told Carney was the adult in the room on the climate crisis. Instead, forests keep burning, oil companies keep posting record profits, and the man who wrote the book on net-zero is now the one holding the door open for pipelines. If he won't answer for it, no one in cabinet will.

Julie Dabrusin
Julie Dabrusin
Toronto—Danforth
Minister of Environment and Climate Change
What they said before
I opposed the purchase of the Trans Mountain pipeline.Public statement, House of Commons record
What is happening now

As Environment Minister, she is now defending the government's broader climate agenda while not clearly rejecting new pipeline expansion.

Why constituents should care

Toronto—Danforth voters elected someone with strong climate credentials. They deserve clarity on whether that opposition to Trans Mountain still applies as new pipeline expansion advances.

Mark Gerretsen
Mark Gerretsen
Kingston and the Islands
Chief Government Whip
What they said before
Voted against a pro–Trans Mountain opposition motion — one of the few Liberals with a stronger environmental record on the file.House of Commons vote record
What is happening now

Now, as Chief Government Whip, he has not been a visible critic of the government's new pipeline direction — absolute silence on Trans Mountain, with a focus on 'nation-building', despite his firm stance against the pipeline in 2018.

Why constituents should care

Kingston voters should ask whether his earlier pipeline skepticism still stands, or whether caucus discipline now comes first.

François-Philippe Champagne
François-Philippe Champagne
Saint-Maurice—Champlain
Minister of Finance & National Revenue
What they said before
Previously framed climate and economic policy around clean growth, competitiveness, and 'pragmatic' investment.
What is happening now

Now says Canada is striking the 'right balance' between oil and gas expansion and the clean economy.

Why constituents should care

Constituents should ask why climate leadership now includes expanding fossil fuel export infrastructure.

Dominic LeBlanc
Dominic LeBlanc
Beauséjour
What they said before
Previously presented major projects as requiring federal-provincial compromise and responsible review.
What is happening now

Now has a key role in the 'national interest' / fast-track project framework that can accelerate pipelines and other major infrastructure.

Why constituents should care

Beauséjour voters should care because Atlantic communities face major climate risks while Ottawa speeds approvals for fossil-fuel infrastructure.

Gregor Robertson
Gregor Robertson
Vancouver Fraserview—South Burnaby
What they said before
As Vancouver mayor, opposed Kinder Morgan/Trans Mountain, warning it could create 'market failure and an environmental tragedy.'Stand.earth
What is happening now

Now in federal politics, he has not been a prominent public opponent while the government advances a new west-coast pipeline plan.

Why constituents should care

A coastal BC riding on the front line of tanker-traffic risk. Vancouver-area voters should ask whether the former anti-pipeline mayor still stands by his coastal protection position.

Anita Anand
Anita Anand
Oakville East
Minister of Foreign Affairs
What they said before
Defended carbon pricing as a climate-and-affordability policy, saying the government would 'keep going' with it.Open Parliament, Hansard
What is happening now

Now, as Foreign Affairs Minister, she has not been a leading public critic of the government's new pipeline and fossil-fuel export direction.

Why constituents should care

Oakville East voters should ask whether Canada's international climate credibility is weakened when cabinet supports fossil-fuel export expansion.